Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

Ok, I should be posting on my AFS-weekend, and I will in time, but right now, I feel a serious urge to get pissed at the crappy system that is the University of Antwerp.
*ahem*
Sensible readers, please, take no offence. The stuff that'll be here will be lively with swearing and cussing. I'm not in my happy mood now. sweatdrop Thanks ^_^
*ahem*



What the ******** is wrong with the asshats that became ******** teachers at my univ? It's like, they fail my assignment TWICE and now, they expect me to actually get a paper done without delay for tomorrow?
What the heck? How ******** wasted are they?
Seriously? C'mon, this is ridiculous. I have to make a paper and all that jazz WITHOUT having an official theme? Or anything related to it? ********? How moronic and evil are they?
Aight, it's like this. If I don't have a freggin' goal to work for, how am I to work, at all?
I mean, they rejected my assignment two weeks ago. Then I fell ill. I can't research if I'm in bed, right? Right. So I start thinking on what I can write about.
Yabber yabber...I figure something out. Now, I remember from past experience that them profs are rather bad at understanding my goals (they have the analythical skills of dead musquitos) in these papers, so I sent in a short "this is what I want to do, is that ok?". Guess what the answer was. It's along the line of "Go sod yourself, we hate you and therefor...


please hand in your introduction to your paper by tomorrow. Everyone else has one by now. Also, bring a full bibliography and be ready to talk about it in dept, this includes any possible variations on your current train of thoughts and questions which you want to work about."

I for one, am not happy about that. At all. I mean...sure, everyone who didn't get flunked on the assignment, which aren't a lot of people, is bound to have their paper finished by now. Hell, I'd have my paper finished if it wasn't for
*(first failure) Not related to your source <it was about the influence of naval control on world politics in the 16-17th century>
*(second failure) The words you use are too general and too hard <...university level? Anyway, it was: The papal doctrine has a negative impact on interculturalisation towards the end of the middle-ages>
I mean. Honestly, both of these would have made great topics. I could fill the ED here on Gaia with coherent stories by staying true to these topics. But noooo, ******** want their own sense of "I'm good" to prevail.
God damned assclowns. I mean, whose buttplug did they shove wrong?

"This is an important subject for you first bachellor and 70% of your marks depends on the session of tomorrow, we expect you worked hard on it."
stressed stressed stressed
That's basically
"Hello, remember that time I couldn't say anything because you outsmarted me? I am going to get even right...now."

And then, the closing line of their ******** statement.

"We look forward to seeing you tomorrow"
It translates as
"I hope you rot in hell...in a stinky way...Oh, I have some more time. Let me just push you a little deeper".

Well, sod that, if you ask me, profs who work like this deserve to get themselves blown up after being gangbanged by several large and sweaty elephants.
But then again, that's my opinion. Who gives a damn about that anyway?
Bunch of tight-assed bastards who have no kind of personal life nor will have at any time in the future, condemned for life to be stuck in a routine which has about as much hope of escape as an limbless man has to crawl off the railroad tracks. A routine which is probably about as interesting as dead fish rotting away.
********.
May large and sweaty elephant phalusses extend their arserim to the width of the Saturnian rings.

Amen,
Jorre